RPM Package Manager ( Red Hat Package Manager, abbreviated RPM) is a package management system.^[1] The name RPM refers to two things: a software package file format, and software packaged in this format. RPM was intended primarily for Linux distributions; the file format RPM is the baseline package format of the Linux Standard Base.

Originally developed by Red Hat for Red Hat Linux, RPM is now used by many Linux distributions. It has also been ported to some other operating systems, such as Novell NetWare (as of version 6.5 SP3) and IBM's AIX as of version 4.

"RPM Package Manager" as it is used today is an example of a recursive acronym.

The local RPM database

Working behind the scenes of the package manager is the RPM database, stored in /var/lib/rpm. It consists of a single database (Packages) containing all of the meta information of the installed rpms and multiple databases used for indexing purposes. The database is used to keep track of all files that are changed and created when a user (using RPM) installs a package, thus enabling the user (via RPM) to reverse the changes and remove the package later. If the database gets corrupted (which is possible if the RPM client is killed), the index databases can be recreated with the rpm --rebuilddb command.^[2]

Package label

Every RPM package has a package label, which contains the following pieces of information:

• the software name
• the software version (the version taken from original "upstream" source of the software)
• the package release (the number of times the package has been rebuilt using the same version of the software). This field is also often used for indicating the specific distribution the package is intended for by appending strings like "mdv" (formerly, "mdk") (Mandriva Linux), "fc4" (Fedora Core 4), "rhl9" (Red Hat Linux 9), "suse100" (SUSE Linux 10.0) etc.
• the architecture the package was built for (i386, i686, athlon, ppc, etc.)

RPM file names normally have the following format:

<name>-<version>-<release>.<arch>.rpm

An example:

nano-0.98-2.i386.rpm

A package label is contained within the file and does not necessarily need to match the name of the file. Source code may also be distributed in RPM packages. Such package labels do not have an architecture part and replace it with "src". E.g.:

libgnomeuimm-2.0-2.0.0-3.src.rpm

Additionally, libraries are distributed in two separate packages for each version. One contains the precompiled code, while the second one contains the development files such as headers, static library files, etc. for the library in question. Those packages have "-devel" appended to their name field. Users need to carefully check so that the version of the development package matches that of the binary package, otherwise the library may not work very well.

RPM files with the noarch.rpm extension refer to files which do not depend on a certain computer's architecture. These files usually include graphics and text for another program to use, and sometimes programs written in an interpreted programming language, such as Python programs and shell scripts.

Advantages and disadvantages of the format

Package managers have many advantages over relying on manual installation such as:

• They present a uniform, clean way for users to install and remove programs with a single command
• There are many popular interfaces, both command-line and graphical
• Non-interactive installation makes it easy to automate.

RPM also has a few advantages over other package managers:

• It is popular: the typical rpm repository contains thousands of free applications, though this is also true for the deb.
• RPM and deb packages can be cryptographically verified with GPG and MD5.
• Original source archive (e.g. .tar.gz, .tar.bz2) are included in SRPMs, making verification easier.
• DeltaRPMs, the RPM equivalent of a patch file, can incrementally update RPM-installed software without needing the original package.

RPM has also been criticized for a lack of consistency in package names and content which can make automatic dependency handling difficult. However, this is not a problem inherent in the RPM format, but rather because of differing packaging guidelines among major Linux distributions that use RPM in packaging such as Fedora, SUSE, and Mandriva Linux. When using packages that are from a particular distribution (say Red Hat Linux) or built for a particular distribution (for example Freshrpms for Fedora),^[3] tools such as urpmi, yum or apt can perform automatic dependency checking.

The default installer for RPM files, aptly named rpm, does not follow dependency information automatically, requiring the user to manually download various RPM-files. Moreover, circular dependencies between mutually dependent RPMs cannot be installed with rpm unless the user is aware that he needs to specify both on the rpm installer's parameter list first. This leads to what is known as 'dependency hell', particularly for packages with many dependencies, each of which has its own large set of dependencies, and so on. For this reason, wrappers around the rpm tool have been created to help ameliorate the problem; urpmi and yum are two such wrappers.

Spec file

The "recipe" for creating an RPM package is a spec file. Spec files end in the ".spec" suffix and contain the package name, version, RPM revision number, steps to build, install, and clean a package, and a changelog. Multiple packages can be built from a single RPM spec file, if desired. RPM packages are created from RPM spec files using the rpmbuild tool.

Spec files are usually distributed within SRPM files, which contain the spec file packaged along with the source code.

Physical package format

The package is a binary format and consists of four sections:^[1]

• The lead identifies the file as an RPM file and contains some obsolete headers.
• The signature which can be used to ensure integrity and/or authenticity
• The header contains metadata including package name, version, architecture, file list, etc..
• A file archive, which usually is cpio compressed with gzip. In more recent versions of RPM star can also be used for archive and bzip2 or lzma for compression. RPM 5.0 format supports using xar for archiving.

RPM-based Linux distributions

Several Linux distributions are based on RPM. These include, but are not limited to:

• Fedora
• Mandriva Linux and derivatives:
  • AltLinux
• Linux for PlayStation 2
• Red Flag Linux
• Red Hat Enterprise Linux and derivatives:
  • CentOS
  • ASPLinux
  • Scientific Linux
• SUSE Linux/openSUSE
• ArkLinux
• Yellow Dog Linux
• PLD Linux Distribution
• Linux XP
• TurboLinux
• PCLinuxOS

Front ends

There are several front ends to RPM that resolve dependencies.

The best-known ones are:

• up2date used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux and CentOS (CentOS-3 and CentOS-4).
• Synaptic Package Manager used in PCLinuxOS.
• yum used in Fedora, CentOS-5, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and above, Scientific Linux and Yellow Dog Linux
• YaST and Zypper used in openSUSE Linux
• urpmi used in Mandriva Linux
• rpmdrake, a graphical urpmi frontend by Mandriva Linux
• apt-rpm, a port of Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool (APT)
• Smart Package Manager, available for many distributions

Controversy

As of the 31 May 2007, there are two versions of RPM in development — one led by the Fedora Project and Red Hat, and the other by a separate group led by a previous maintainer of RPM, a former employee of Red Hat. Both projects currently call themselves the "official" version of RPM.

RPM v4

The rpm.org community's RPM is hosted by Duke University, and the majority of content is maintained in the wiki. The maintainer of RPM is Red Hat developer Panu Matilainen. RPM.org issued its first major code revision in July 2007, and the latest version, 4.4.2.3, was released on 1 April 2008. Its version is used by Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Novell's OpenSUSE, Mandriva and CentOS. Panu Matilainen is also the current maintainer of apt-rpm.

RPM v5

The RPM maintainer since 1999, Jeff Johnson, continued his development efforts after leaving Red Hat. Johnson combined with the efforts of OpenPKG in May 2007 to produce RPM version 5. This version is used by distributions like PLD and supported by OpenPKG. This code base has also been ported to many platforms, including BSD, Linux, Solaris and Mac OS X Unix flavors, as well as Microsoft Windows via Cygwin. Additionally, the code base was heavily cleaned up, and now can be compiled with all major C compiler suites, including GNU GCC, Sun Studio and Intel C/C++.

Changes and new features include:

• RPM packages, in addition to the default Gzip and optional Bzip2 compression, now also support LZMA compression
• initial support for the XML Archive (XAR) file format has been added, where the implementation establishes a wrapper archive format for mapping the four sections used in RPM format packages (Lead, Signature, Header and Payload) to files with the same name in a XAR format package.
• support for the old RPMv3 LSB package format was removed to cleanup and simplify the code base. RPM 5, with respect to RPM format packages, now supports RPMv4 format only.
• features for use in package specifications (.spec files) were added, including new standard and even custom tags, new standard sections, etc.
• RPM is now able to automatically track vendor distribution files with its new vcheck(1) based "%track" section, and now can automatically download the vendor distribution files, too.^[4]

See also

• Autopackage - a "complementary" package management system
• dpkg - package management system used by Debian and its derivatives such as Ubuntu and Xandros
• Portage - package management system used by Gentoo
• pkg-config - queries libraries to compile software from its source code

References

External links

• Red Hat RPM Guide from the Fedora project.
• Jeff Johnson's RPM Package Manager homepage
• RPM 4 project home page
• RPM and DPKG command reference
• The story of RPM by Matt Frye in Red Hat Magazine
• Advanced RPM query strings

ar:???? ??? ?? ?? ?? ca:Sistema de paquets rpm cs:RPM Package Manager da:RPM de:RPM Package Manager es:RPM Package Manager fr:RPM Package Manager ko:RPM ??? ??? id:RPM Package Manager it:RPM Package Manager ms:RPM Package Manager nl:RPM Package Manager ja:RPM Package Manager no:RPM Package Manager uz:RPM pl:RPM pt:RPM ru:RPM sk:RPM fi:RPM Package Manager sv:.rpm uk:RPM zh:RPM?????