In English, the hundreds are perfectly regular, except that the word hundred remains in its singular form regardless of the number preceding it (nevertheless, one may on the other hand say "hundreds of people flew in", or the like)
In American usage, four-digit numbers with non-zero hundreds are often named using multiples of "hundred" and combined with tens and ones: "One thousand one", "Eleven hundred three", "Twelve hundred twenty-five", "Four thousand forty-two", or "Ninety-nine hundred ninety-nine." In British usage, this style is common for multiples of 100 between 1,000 and 2,000 (e.g. 1,500 as "fifteen hundred") but not for higher numbers.
Americans may pronounce four-digit numbers with non-zero tens and ones as pairs of two-digit numbers without saying "hundred" and inserting "oh" for zero tens: "twenty-six fifty-nine" or "forty-one oh five". This usage probably evolved from the distinctive usage for years; 'nineteen-eighty-one'. It is avoided for numbers less than 2500 if the context may mean confusion with time of day: "ten ten" or "twelve oh four."
Intermediate numbers are read differently depending on their use. Their typical naming occurs when the numbers are used for counting. Another way is for when they are used as labels. The second column method is used much more often in American English than British English. The third column is used in British English, but rarely in American English (although the use of the second and third columns is not necessarily directly interchangeable between the two regional variants). In other words, the British dialect can seemingly adopt the American way of counting, but it is specific to the situation (in this example, bus numbers).
Common British vernacular
Common American vernacular
Common British vernacular
"How many marbles do you have?"
"What is your house number?"
"Which bus goes to the high street?"
101
"A hundred and one."
"One-oh-one." Here, "oh" is used for the digit zero.
"One-oh-one."
109
"A hundred and nine."
"One-oh-nine."
"One-oh-nine."
110
"A hundred and ten."
"One-ten."
"One-one-oh."
117
"A hundred and seventeen."
"One-seventeen."
"One-one-seven."
120
"A hundred and twenty."
"One-twenty."
"One-two-oh", "One-two-zero."
152
"A hundred and fifty-two."
"One-fifty-two."
"One-five-two."
208
"Two hundred and eight."
"Two-oh-eight."
"Two-oh-eight."
334
"Three hundred and thirty-four."
"Three-thirty-four."
"Three-three-four."
Note: When writing a cheque (or check), the number 100 is always written "one hundred". It is never "a hundred".
Note that in American English, many students are taught not to use the word and anywhere in the whole part of a number, so it is not used before the tens and ones. It is instead used as a verbal delimiter when dealing with compound numbers. Thus, instead of "three hundred and seventy-three", one would say "three hundred seventy-three". For details, see American and British English differences.
For numbers above a million, there are two different systems for naming numbers in English:
the long scale (decreasingly used in British English) designates a system of numeric names in which a thousand million is called a milliard (but the latter usage is now rare), and billion is used for a million million.
the short scale (always used in American English and increasingly in British English) designates a system of numeric names in which a thousand million is called a billion, and the word milliard is not used
Although British English has traditionally followed the long-scale numbering system, the short-scale usage has become increasingly common in recent years. For example, the UK Government and BBC websites use the newer short-scale values exclusively.
Here are some approximate composite large numbers in American English:
Often, large numbers are written with (preferably non-breaking) half-spaces or thin spaces separating the thousands (and, sometimes, with normal spaces or apostrophes) instead of commas—to ensure that confusion is not caused in countries where a decimal comma is used. Thus, a million is often written .
A few numbers have special names (in addition to their regular names):
0: has several other names, depending on context:
zero: formal scientific usage
naught / nought: mostly British usage
aught: Mostly archaic but still occasionally used when a digit in mid-number is 0 (as in "thirty-aught-six", the .30-06 Springfield rifle cartridge and by association guns that fire it)
oh: used when spelling numbers (like telephone, bank account, bus line)
nil: in general sport scores, British usage ("The score is two-nil.")
nothing: in general sport scores, American usage ("The score is two to nothing.")
null: used technically to refer to an object or idea related to nothingness, such as the null value in computer science which is technically very different from zero. The 0th aleph number (\aleph_0) is pronounced "aleph-null".
love: in tennis (origin disputed, often said to come from Frenchl'?uf, "egg")
zilch, nada (from Spanish), zip: used informally when stressing nothingness; this is true especially in combination with one another ("You know nothing—zero, zip, nada, zilch!")
120: a great hundred (twelve tens; as opposed to the small hundred, i.e. 100 or ten tens), also called small gross (ten dozens), both archaic; also sometimes referred to as duodecimal hundred
144: a gross (a dozen dozens, second power of the duodecimal base), used mostly in commerce
1728: a great gross (a dozen gross, third power of the duodecimal base), used mostly in commerce
10,000: a myriad (a hundred hundred), commonly used in the sense of an indefinite very high number
100,000: a lakh (a hundred thousand), loanword used mainly in Indian English
10,000,000: a crore (a hundred lakh), loanword used mainly in Indian English
10^{100}: googol (1 followed by 100 zeros), used in mathematics; not to be confused with the name of the company Google (which was originally a misspelling of googol)
10^{10^{100}}: googolplex (1 followed by a googol of zeros)
10^{10^{10^{100}}}: googolplexplex (1 followed by a googolplex of zeros)
Combinations of numbers in most sports scores are read as in the following examples:
1–0 British English: one nil; American English: one-nothing, or one-zero
0–0 British English: nil-nil, or nil all; American English: zero-zero or nothing-nothing, (occasionally scoreless or no score)
2–2 two-two (or two to two, or two all, or twos, or even at two, or two up.)
Naming conventions of Tennis scores (and related sports) work a lot differently to most other sports.
A few numbers have specialised multiplicative numerals expresses how many fold or how many times: once, twice, thrice.[1]
Ordinal numbers
Ordinal numbers refer to a position in a series. Common ordinals include:
Zeroth only has a meaning when counts start with zero, which happens in a mathematical or computer science context.
Ordinal numbers such as 21st, 33rd, etc., are formed by combining a cardinal ten with an ordinal unit.
21st
twenty-first
25th
twenty-fifth
32nd
thirty-second
58th
fifty-eighth
64th
sixty-fourth
79th
seventy-ninth
83rd
eighty-third
99th
ninety-ninth
Higher ordinals are not often written in words, unless they are round numbers (thousandth, millionth, billionth). They are written using digits and letters as described below. Here are some rules that should be borne in mind.
The suffixes -th, -st, -nd and -rd are occasionally written superscript above the number itself.
If the tens digit of a number is 1, then write "th" after the number. For example: 13th, 19th, 112th, 9,311th.
If the tens digit is not equal to 1, then use the following table:
If the units digit is:
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
write this after the number
th
st
nd
rd
th
th
th
th
th
th
For example: 2nd, 7th, 20th, 23rd, 52nd, 135th, 301st.
These ordinal abbreviations are actually hybrid contractions of a numeral and a word. 1st is "1" + "st" from "first". Similarly, we use "nd" for "second" and "rd" for "third". In the legal field and in some older publications, the ordinal abbreviation for "second" and "third" is simply, "d"
For example: 42d, 33d, 23d.
Any ordinal name that doesn't end in "first", "second", or "third", ends in "th".
Dates
There are a number of ways to read years. The following table offers a list of valid pronunciations and alternate pronunciations for any given year of the Gregorian calendar. The favorable pronunciation is determined by number of syllables.
Nine-nine-nine Nine hundred (and) ninety-nine Triple nine
1000
One thousand
Ten hundred 1K Ten aught Ten oh
1004
Ten oh-four
One thousand (and) four
1010
Ten ten
One thousand (and) ten
1050
Ten fifty
One thousand (and) fifty
1225
Twelve twenty-five
One-two-two-five One thousand, two hundred (and) twenty-five Twelve-two-five
1900
Nineteen hundred
One thousand, nine hundred Nineteen aught Nineteen oh
1901
Nineteen oh-one
Nineteen hundred (and) one One thousand, nine hundred (and) one Nineteen aught one
1919
Nineteen nineteen
Nineteen hundred (and) nineteen One thousand, nine hundred (and) nineteen
1999
Nineteen ninety-nine
Nineteen hundred (and) ninety-nine One thousand, nine hundred (and) ninety-nine
2000
Two thousand
Twenty hundred Two triple-oh 2K Twenty aught Twenty oh
2001
Two thousand (and) one
Twenty oh-one Twenty hundred (and) one 2K1
2009
Two thousand (and) nine
Twenty oh-nine Twenty hundred (and) nine 2K9
2010
Twenty-ten
Two thousand (and) ten Twenty hundred (and) ten
2013
Twenty-thirteen
Two thousand (and) thirteen Twenty hundred (and) thirteen
2020
Twenty-twenty
Two thousand (and) twenty Twenty hundred (and) twenty
2025
Twenty twenty-five
Two thousand (and) twenty five Twenty hundred (and) twenty five
2099
Twenty ninety-nine
Two thousand (and) ninety-nine Twenty hundred (and) ninety-nine
2100
Twenty-one hundred
Two thousand, one hundred Twenty-one-oh Twenty-one-aught
2101
Twenty-one-oh-one
Two thousand, one hundred (and) one Twenty one hundred (and) one
Years are rarely read explicitly as ordinal numbers, as "[...] in the one thousand one hundred and ninety-seventh year of our Lord" (that is, 1197), even though ordinal numbers are implicit in traditional western calendrical systems. Also, years are numbered with cardinal numbers in astronomical usage, and in the Hindu and Mayan calendrical systems (see Year zero). Some Quaker communities refer to days of the week in ordinal fashion; in this usage "First Day" is Sunday, "Second Day" is Monday, etc.
In British, European and International (covering most of the world) English, the day usually comes before the month and the ordinal suffix is always vocalised and often appended: "the 1st of October 1984". However, other usages are not exceptional; "October the First is too Late" is the name of a novel by the English astronomer Fred Hoyle. In writing, the and especially of, while vocalised, are generally left out from the written date, particularly when the date stands alone, such as when writing cheques: 1st October 1984. The full form was common in older English, as can be seen in old English literature. The three main written forms are therefore:
The 25th of January 2005 (old English extended form rarely used now in written form, but still fully used for all three forms in spoken English)
25th January 2005 (omitting "the" and "of")
25 January 2005 (omitting the ordinal suffix)
In North American English, the day usually comes after the month and the ordinal suffix is rarely written, but optionally vocalized: "September 4, 1990" (read "September four(th), nineteen ninety"). The British form is still used for certain dates such as the Fourth of July.
Compare:
Today is (the) 14th (of) March 2004. (British and international form, read "Today is the fourteenth of March, two thousand and four").
We signed the documents on June 10, 1969. (North American form, read "...on June ten(th), nineteen sixty-nine").
The comma before the year is optional. It is usually used in American English (September 4, 2004) but now seldom used in British and International English (4 September 2004). In abbreviations of month names, such as "Aug" for August, the period or full stop is often left out.
For an explanation of British, American and International usage for dates written in numbers, such as 14/03/2004 or 3/14/2004 or 2004-03-14, see calendar date.
Fractions and decimals
Here are some common fractions (partitive numerals[2]):
Alternatively, and for greater numbers, one may say for 1/2 "one over two", for 5/8 "five over eight", and so on. This "over" form is also widely used in mathematics. (This form is not common in British English.)
Numbers with a decimal point may be read as a cardinal number, then "and", then another cardinal number followed by an indication of the significance of the second cardinal number (not common in British English); or as a cardinal number, followed by "point", and then by the digits of the fractional part. The indication of significance takes the form of the denominator of the fraction indicating division by the smallest power of ten larger than the second cardinal. This is modified when the first cardinal is zero, in which case neither the zero nor the "and" is pronounced, but the zero is optional in the "point" form of the fraction.
For example:
0.002 is "two thousandths" (mainly U.S.); or "point zero zero two", "point oh oh two", "nought point zero zero two", etc.
3.1416 is "three and one thousand four hundred sixteen ten-thousandths" (mainly U.S.); or "three point one four one six"
99.3 is "ninety-nine and three tenths" (mainly U.S.); or "ninety-nine point three".
In English the decimal point was originally printed in the center of the line (0·002), but with the advent of the typewriter it was placed at the bottom of the line, so that a single key could be used as a full stop/period and as a decimal point. In many non-English languages a full-stop/period at the bottom of the line is used as a thousands separator with a comma being used as the decimal point.
Fractions together with an integer are read as follows:
1 1/2 is "one and a half"
6 1/4 is "six and a quarter"
7 5/8 is "seven and five eighths"
A space is required between the whole number and the fraction; however, if a special fraction character is used like "½", then the space can be done without, e.g.
9 1/2
9½
Whether to use digits or words
According to most copy editors and English teachers, the numbers zero through nine inclusive should be "written out" – meaning instead of "1" and "2", one would write "one" and "two".
Example: "I have two apples." (Preferred)
Example: "I have 2 apples."
After "nine", one can head straight back into the 10, 11, 12, etc., although some write out the numbers until "twelve".
Example: "I have 28 grapes." (Preferred)
Example: "I have twenty-eight grapes."
Another common usage is to write out any number that can be expressed as one or two words, and use figures otherwise.
Examples:
"There are six million dogs." (Preferred)
"There are 6,000,000 dogs."
"That is one hundred twenty-five oranges."
"That is 125 oranges." (Preferred)
Numbers at the beginning of a sentence should also be written out.
The above rules are not always used. In literature, larger numbers might be spelled out. On the other hand, digits might be more commonly used in technical or financial articles, where many figures are discussed. In particular, the two different forms should not be used for figures that serve the same purpose; for example, it is inelegant to write, "Between day twelve and day 15 of the study, the population doubled."
Empty numbers
Colloquial English has a small vocabulary of empty numbers that can be employed when there is uncertainty as to the precise number to use, but it is desirable to define a general range: specifically, the terms "umpteen", "umpty", and "zillion". These are derived etymologically from the range affixes:
"-teen" (designating the range as being between 10 and 20)
"-ty" (designating the range as being in one of the decades between 20 and 100)
"-illion" (designating the range as being above 1,000,000; or, more generally, as being extremely large).
The prefix "ump-" is added to the first two suffixes to produce the empty numbers "umpteen" and "umpty": it is of uncertain origin. There is a noticeable absence of an empty number in the hundreds range.
Usage of empty numbers:
The word "umpteen" may be used as an adjective, as in "I had to go to umpteen stores to find shoes that fit." It can also be used to modify a larger number, usually "million", as in "Umpteen million people watched the show; but they still cancelled it."
"Umpty" is not in common usage. It can appear in the form "umpty-one" (parallelling the usage in such numbers as "twenty-one"), as in "There are umpty-one ways to do it wrong." "Umpty-ump" is also heard, though "ump" is never used by itself.
The word "zillion" may be used as an adjective, modifying a noun. The noun phrase normally contains the indefinite article "a", as in "There must be a zillion sites on the World Wide Web."
The plural "zillions" designates a number indefinitely larger than "millions" or "billions". In this case, the construction is parallel to the one for "millions" or "billions", with the number used as a plural count noun, followed by a prepositional phrase with "of", as in "Out in the countryside, the night sky is filled with zillions of stars."
Empty numbers are sometimes made up, with obvious meaning: "squillions" is obviously an empty, but very large, number; a "squintillionth" would be a very small number.
Empty numbers are not modified by actual numbers: in other words, it would not be acceptable to say something like "four zillion" except in jest.
Empty numbers are colloquial, and primarily used in oral speech or informal contexts. They are inappropriate in formal or scholarly usage.
While there are a number of "rules" about ways of expressing numbers, the essential requirement must always be to avoid ambiguity. Different authorities do not always agree; for example the following sentence was found in a perfectly respectable document. "It has sold 10,000,000 copies. It was number 21 on a recent list of the 100 most important non-fiction books of the 20th century." This sentence is perfectly clear, and it is unlikely that any reader would change his attitude toward the author because of these "errors".
The usage of either a comma or a point in a number provides a degree of ambiguity too. The number 1,000 would be read as being one thousand in the US and the UK, and as Exactly One in most of Europe and elsewhere. Modern usage in ISO 31-0 shows either the point or the dot to be used for the "Exactly One" form, and for spaces to be used in very large or very small numbers, like in 1 000 000 or in 0.000 000 005 and so on.
With the rise of computers, use of the name of the letter "O" to signify both the letter "O" and numeric zero has become ambiguous. If numbers are typed into the computer as spoken, problems may arise if the numbers are used for anything other than simple display. If a house number is shown on screen as "12O" instead of "120", no harm is done. But if this error is made in a telephone number to be dialed, or in calculations, problems will arise. The simplest solution is always to say "zero" or "nought".
Numeric dates, as normally abbreviated, are ambiguous: the forms "mm/dd/yy", "dd/mm/yy" (where "yy" may be a 2-digit or 4-digit year), are used in different places; in the US, the former is used, and is reflected in the spoken convention for dates there, for example 10/04/05 would be read "October Fourth, Two Thousand Five", whereas in Britain, the latter naming convention is used, and would be spoken as "(The) Tenth of April, Two Thousand and Five". The international standard, with the form YYYY-MM-DD avoids ambiguity and 2005-07-09 always means 2005 July the 9th.