A genus (plural: genera, from ; Latin genus "descent, family, type, gender") is a low-level taxonomic rank used in the classification of living and fossil organisms. The taxonomic ranks are life, domain, kingdom (biology), phylum, class (biology), order (biology), family (biology), genus, and species

Like almost all other taxonomic units, genera may sometimes be divided into subgenera, singular: subgenus. The largest main taxonomic unit below the genus is the species.

How to more precisely define a genus is a matter of continuing debate, as outlined a few paragraphs below.

Generic name

Generic name is a part of the scientific name for an organism. It is a name which reflects the classification of the organism by grouping it with other closely similar organisms. The generic name is always Latin, and is the first of the two names in the scientific name (the second is the species). The first letter of the generic name is always capitalized, and the first letter of the specific name is never capitalized. For example, the scientific name for the wolf is Canis lupis. Canis, meaning dog, is the generic name, because the wolf is a canine.

Types and genera

Because of the rules of scientific naming, or "nomenclature", each genus must have a designated type species (see Type (zoology) ) which defines the genus; the generic name is permanently associated with the type specimen of its type species. Should this specimen turn out to be assignable to another genus, the genus name linked to it becomes a junior synonym, and the remaining taxa in the now-invalid genus need to be reassessed. See scientific classification and Nomenclature Codes for more details of this system. Also see type genus.

One attempt to define a genus

The rules-of-thumb for delimiting a genus are outlined e.g. in Gill et al. (2005). According to these, a genus should fulfill 3 criteria to be descriptively useful:

• monophyly ? all descendants of an ancestral taxon are grouped together;
• reasonable compactness ? a genus should not be expanded needlessly; and
• distinctness ? in regards of evolutionarily relevant criteria, i.e. ecology, morphology, or biogeography; note that DNA sequences are a consequence rather than a condition of diverging evolutionarily lineages except in cases where they directly inhibit gene flow (e.g. postzygotic barriers).

The transition to modern phylogenetic classification

Neither the ICZN nor the ICBN require such criteria for establishment of a genus, and this is because they are concerned with the rules of nomenclature rather than the rules of taxonomy. The ICZN and ICBN rule books cover the formalities of what makes a description valid.

The three criteria given above are almost always fulfillable for a given clade. However, an example of a situation where at least one criterion is crassly violated no matter what the generic arrangement is the case of the dabbling ducks in the genus Anas. This group is paraphyletic in regard to the extremely distinct fossil species, moa-nalo. Considering these to be distinct genera (as is usually done) violates criterion 1, including them all in the genus Anas violates criteria 2 and 3, and splitting up the genus Anas so that the mallard and the American black duck are in distinct genera violates criterion 3.

The problem of identical names used for different genera

A genus in one kingdom is allowed to bear a name that is in use as a genus name or other taxon name in another kingdom. Although this is discouraged by both the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, there are some five thousand such names that are in use in more than one kingdom. For instance, Anura is the name of the order of frogs but also is the name of a genus of plants (although not current: it is a synonym); Aotus is the genus of golden peas and night monkeys; Oenanthe is the genus of wheatears and water dropworts, and Prunella is the genus of accentors and self-heal.

Within the same kingdom one generic name can apply to only one genus. This explains why the platypus genus is named Ornithorhynchus ? George Shaw named it Platypus in 1799, but the name Platypus had already been given to the pinhole borer beetle by Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Herbst in 1793. Names with the same form but applying to different taxa are called homonyms. Since beetles and platypuses are both members of the kingdom Animalia, the name Platypus could not be used for both. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach published the replacement name Ornithorhynchus in 1800.

External links

• Nomenclator Zoologicus: Index of all genus and subgenus names in zoological nomenclature from 1758 to 2004.
• generic name http://www.biolib.cz/en/glossaryterm/dir283/id2280/

af:Genus als:Gattung (Biologie) ar:??? (?????) an:Chenero (biolochía) bs:Rod (biologija) br:Genad ca:Gènere (biologia) cs:Rod (biologie) cy:Genws (bioleg) da:Slægt (biologi) de:Gattung (Biologie) et:Perekond (bioloogia) el:????? (????????) es:Género (biología) eo:Genro (biologio) eu:Genero (biologia) fa:???? fr:Genre (biologie) fy:Skaai ga:Géineas gl:Xénero (bioloxía) ko:? (???) hr:Rod (taksonomija) id:Genus ia:Genere (biologia) is:Ættkvísl (flokkunarfræði) it:Genere (tassonomia) he:??? (?????????) jv:Genus lb:Gattung (Biologie) lt:Gentis lv:?ints (biolo?ija) hu:Nemzetség (rendszertan) mt:?eneru ms:Genus nl:Geslacht (biologie) ja:? (???) no:Slekt (biologi) nn:Biologisk slekt oc:Genre (biologia) nds:Geslecht (Biologie) pam:Genus pl:Rodzaj (biologia) pt:Género (biologia) ro:Gen (biologie) ru:??? scn:Gèniri (bioluggìa) simple:Genus sk:Rod (taxonómia) sl:Rod (biologija) sr:??? (?????????) fi:Suku (biologia) sv:Släkte tl:Sari ta:??????? (????????) te:??????? th:???? (????????) vi:Chi (sinh h?c) tr:Cins uk:??? (????????) ur:??? vls:Geslacht (biologie) yi:??? (????????) zh:? (??)