Exponentiation is a mathematical operation, written aⁿ, involving two numbers, the base a and the exponent n. When n is a positive integer, exponentiation corresponds to repeated multiplication:

a^n = \underbrace{a \times \cdots \times a}_n,

just as multiplication by a whole number corresponds to repeated addition:

a \times n = \underbrace{a + \cdots + a}_n.

The exponent is usually shown as a superscript to the right of the base. The exponentiation aⁿ can be read as: a raised to the n-th power or a raised to the power [of] n, or more briefly: a to the n-th power or a to the power [of] n, or even more briefly: a to the n. Some exponents can be read in a certain way; for example a² is usually read as a squared and a³ as a cubed.

The power aⁿ can also be defined when the exponent n is a negative integer. When the base a is a positive real number, exponentiation is defined for real and even complex exponents n. The special exponential function e^x is fundamental for this definition. It enables the functions of trigonometry to be expressed by exponentiation. However, when the base a is not a positive real number and the exponent n is not an integer, then aⁿ cannot be defined as a unique continuous function of a.

Exponentiation where the exponent is a matrix is used for solving systems of linear differential equations.

Exponentiation is used pervasively in many other fields as well, including economics, biology, chemistry, physics, and computer science, with applications such as compound interest, population growth, chemical reaction kinetics, wave behavior, and public key cryptography.

Exponentiation with integer exponents

The exponentiation operation with integer exponents only requires elementary algebra.

Positive integer exponents

a² = a·a is called the square of a because the area of a square with side-length a is a².

a³ = a·a·a is called the cube, because the volume of a cube with side-length a is a³.

So 3² is pronounced "three squared",and 2³ is "two cubed".

The exponent says how many copies of the base are multiplied together. For example, 3⁵ = 3·3·3·3·3 = 243. The base 3 appears 5 times in the repeated multiplication, because the exponent is 5. Here, 3 is the base, 5 is the exponent, and 243 is the power or, more specifically, the fifth power of 3 or 3 raised to the fifth power.

The word "raised" is usually omitted, and most often "power" as well, so 3⁵ is typically pronounced "three to the fifth" or "three to the five".

Formally, powers with positive integer exponents may be defined by the initial condition a¹ = a and the recurrence relation aⁿ⁺¹ = a·aⁿ.

Exponents one and zero

Notice that 3¹ is the product of only one 3, which is evidently 3.

Also note that 3⁵ = 3·3⁴. Also 3⁴ = 3·3³. Continuing this trend, we should have

3¹ = 3·3⁰.

Another way of saying this is that when n, m, and n - m are positive (and if x is not equal to zero), one can see by counting the number of occurrences of x that

\frac{x^n}{x^m} = x^{n - m}.

Extended to the case that n and m are equal, the equation would read

1 = \frac{x^n}{x^n} = x^{n - n} = x^0

since both the numerator and the denominator are equal. Therefore we take this as the definition of x⁰.

Therefore we define 3⁰ = 1 so that the above equality holds. This leads to the following rule:

• Any number to the power 1 is itself.
• Any nonzero number to the power 0 is 1; one interpretation of these powers is as empty products. The case of 0⁰ is discussed below.

Combinatorial interpretation

For non-negative integers n and m, the power n^m equals the cardinality of the set of m-tuples from an n-element set, or the number of m-letter words from an n-letter alphabet.

0⁵ = | {} | = 0. There is no 5-tuple from the empty set.

1⁴ = | { (1,1,1,1) } | = 1. There is one 4-tuple from a one-element set.

2³ = | { (1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,2,1), (1,2,2), (2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,2,1), (2,2,2) } | = 8. There are 8 3-tuples from a two-element set.

3² = | { (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2,1), (2,2), (2,3), (3,1), (3,2), (3,3) } | = 9. There are 9 2-tuples from a three-element set.

4¹ = | { (1), (2), (3), (4) } | = 4. There are 4 1-tuples from a four-element set.

5⁰ = | { () } | = 1. There is exactly one empty tuple.

See also exponentiation over sets.

Negative integer exponents

Raising a nonzero number to the −1 power produces its reciprocal.

a^{-1} = \frac{1}{a}

Thus:

a^{-n} = (a^n)^{-1} = \frac{1}{a^n}

Raising 0 to a negative power would imply division by 0, and so is undefined.

A negative integer exponent can also be seen as repeated division by the base. Thus 3^{-4} = (((1/3)/3)/3)/3 = \frac{1}{81} = \frac{1}{3^{4}}.

Identities and properties

The most important identity satisfied by integer exponentiation is:

a^{m + n} = a^m \cdot a^n

This identity has the consequence:

a^{m - n} =\frac{a^m}{a^n}

for a ? 0, and

(a^m)^n = a^{m \cdot n} .

Another basic identity is

(a \cdot b)^n = a^n \cdot b^n.

While addition and multiplication are commutative (for example, 2+3 = 5 = 3+2 and 2·3 = 6 = 3·2), exponentiation is not commutative: 2³ = 8, but 3² = 9.

Similarly, while addition and multiplication are associative (for example, (2+3)+4 = 9 = 2+(3+4) and (2·3)·4 = 24 = 2·(3·4), exponentiation is not associative either: 2³ to the 4th power is 8⁴ or 4096, but 2 to the 3⁴ power is 2⁸¹ or 2,417,851,639,229,258,349,412,352. Without parentheses to modify the order of calculation, the order is usually understood to be from right to left:

a^{b^c}=a^{(b^c)}\ne (a^b)^c=a^{(b\cdot c)}=a^{b\cdot c}

Powers of ten

See Scientific notation

Integer powers of 10 can be expressed, in the base ten (decimal) number system, as the number one, either followed or preceded by a number of zeroes determined by the sign and magnitude of the exponent. For example, 10³ = 1000, and 10^-4 = 0.00001.

Exponentiation with base 10 is used in scientific notation to describe large or small numbers. For instance, 299,792,458 (the speed of light in a vacuum, in meters per second) can be written as 2.99792458·10⁸ and then approximated as 2.998·10⁸, (or sometimes as 299.8·10⁶, or 299.8E+6, especially in computer software).

SI prefixes based on powers of 10 are also used to describe small or large quantities. For example, the prefix kilo means 10³ = 1000, so a kilometre is 1000 metres.

Powers of two

The positive powers of 2 are important in computer science because there are 2ⁿ possible values for an n-bit variable. See Binary numeral system.

Powers of 2 are important in set theory since a set with n members has a power set, or set of all subsets of the original set, with 2ⁿ members.

The negative powers of 2 are commonly used, and the first two have special names: half, and quarter.

Integer powers of 2 can be expressed, in the base two (binary) number system, as the number one, either followed or preceded by a number of zeroes determined by the sign and magnitude of the exponent. For example, in binary, two to the power of three = 1000 (binary).

Powers of one

The integer powers of one are one: 1ⁿ = 1.

Powers of zero

If the exponent is positive, the power of zero is zero: 0ⁿ = 0, where n > 0.

If the exponent is negative, the power of zero (0ⁿ, where n < 0) remains undefined, because division by zero is implied.

If the exponent is zero, some authors define 0⁰=1, whereas others leave it undefined, as discussed below.

Powers of minus one

The powers of minus one are useful for expressing alternating sequences.

If the exponent is even, the power of minus one is one: (−1)²ⁿ = 1.

If the exponent is odd, the power of minus one is minus one: (−1)²ⁿ⁺¹ = −1.

Powers of the imaginary unit

The powers of the imaginary unit i are useful for expressing sequences of period 4.

i^{4n+1}=i \!\

Powers of e

The number e, the base of the natural logarithm, is a well studied constant approximately equal to 2.718. It can be approximated by large positive or negative powers of numbers close to one, such as

e \approx1.001^{1000}\,

or

e \approx0.999^{-1000}\,

and defined as the limit

e = \lim_{|n| \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac 1 n \right) ^n\,

Any nonzero integer power of e can be computed like this:

e^k = \left(\lim_{|n| \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{n} \right) ^n\right)^k = \lim_{|n| \rightarrow \infty} \left(\left(1+\frac{1}{n} \right) ^n\right)^k = \lim_{|n| \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac k {n\cdot k} \right)^{n \cdot k} = \lim_{|m| \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac k m \right)^m

The exponential function, defined by

e^x =\lim_{|n| \rightarrow \infty} \left(1+\frac x n \right)^n

has applications in many areas of mathematics and science. This definition of e^x matches the definition of e^k when x is an integer, but it also applies for fractional, real, or complex values of x, and even when x is a square matrix, which is used in ordinary differential equations.

Another popular formula is the power series

e^x = 1 + x+ \frac{x^2}2+ \frac{x^3}6+\cdots+\frac{x^n}{n!}+\cdots \,.

Powers of real numbers

Exponentiation with various bases; from top to bottom, base 10 (green), base e (red), base 2 (blue), base ½ (cyan). Note how all of the curves pass through the point (0, 1). This is because, in accordance with the properties of exponentiation, any non-zero number raised to the power 0 is 1. Also note that at x=1, the y value equals the base. This is because any number raised to the power 1 is that same number.

From top to bottom: x^1/8, x^1/4, x^1/2, x¹, x², x⁴, x⁸.

Raising a positive real number to a power that is not an integer can be accomplished in two ways.

• Rational number exponents can be defined in terms of n^th roots, and arbitrary nonzero exponents can then be defined by continuity.
• The natural logarithm can be used to define real exponents using the exponential function.

The identities and properties shown above are true for non-integer exponents as well.

Principal n-th root

An nth root of a number a is a number b such that bⁿ = a.

When referring to the n-th root of a real number a it is assumed that what is desired is the principal n-th root of the number. If a is a real number, and n is a positive integer, then the unique real solution with the same sign as a to the equation

\ x^n = a

is called the principal n-th root of a, and is denoted ⁿ?a using the radical symbol ? .

x=a^{1/n} = \sqrt[n]{a}.

For example: 4^1/2 = 2, 8^1/3 = 2, (−8)^1/3 = −2.

Note that if n is even, negative numbers do not have a principal n-th root.

Rational powers of positive real numbers

Exponentiation with a rational exponent m/n can be defined as

a^{m/n} = \left(a^m\right)^{1/n} = \sqrt[n]{a^m}.

For example, 8^2/3 = 4.

Since any real number can be approximated by rational numbers, exponentiation to an arbitrary real exponent k can be defined by continuity with the rule

a^k = \lim_{r \to k} a^r,

where the limit is taken only over rational values of r.

For example, if

k \approx 1.732

then

5^k \approx 5^{1.732} =5^{433/250}=\sqrt[250]{5^{433}} \approx 16.241 .

Real powers of positive real numbers

The natural logarithm ln(x) is the inverse of the exponential function e^x. It is defined for every positive real number b and satisfies the equation

b = e^{\ln b}.\,

Assuming b^x is already defined, logarithm and exponent rules give the equality

b^x = (e^{\ln b})^x = e^{x \cdot\ln b}.\,

This equality can be used to define exponentiation with any positive real base b as

b^x = e^{x\cdot\ln b}.\,

This definition of the real number power b^x agrees with the definition given above using rational exponents and continuity. The definition of exponentiation using logarithms is more common in the context of complex numbers, as discussed below.

Some rational powers of negative real numbers

Neither the logarithm method nor the fractional exponent method can be used to define a^k as a real number for a negative real number a and an arbitrary real number k. In some special cases, a definition is possible: integral powers of negative real numbers are real numbers, and rational powers of the form a^m/n where n is odd can be computed using roots. But since there is no real number x such that x² = −1, the definition of a^m/n when n is even and m is odd must use the imaginary unit i, as described more fully in the next section.

The logarithm method cannot be used to define a^k as a real number when a < 0 because e^x is nonnegative for every real number x, so log(a) cannot be a real number.

The rational exponent method cannot be used for negative values of a because it relies on continuity. The function f(r) = a^r has a unique continuous extension from the rational numbers to the real numbers for each a > 0. But when a < 0, the function f is not even continuous on the set of rational numbers r for which it is defined.

For example, take a = −1. The nth root of −1 is −1 for every odd natural number n. So if n is an odd positive integer, (−1)^(m/n) = −1 if m is odd, and (−1)^(m/n) = 1 if m is even. Thus the set of rational numbers q for which −1^q = 1 is dense in the rational numbers, as is the set of q for which −1^q = −1. This means that the function (−1)^q is not continuous at any rational number q where it is defined.

Imaginary powers of e

The exponential function e^z can be defined as the limit of , as N approaches infinity, and thus e^i? is the limit of . In this animation N takes various increasing values from 1 to 100. The computation of is displayed as the combined effect of N repeated multiplications in the complex plane, with the final point being the actual value of . It can be seen that as N gets larger approaches a limit of ?1. Therefore, e^i?=-1, which is known as Euler's identity.

The geometric interpretation of the operations on complex numbers and the definition of powers of e is the clue to understanding e ^i·x for real x. Consider the right triangle (0, 1, 1+i·x/n). For big values of n the triangle is almost a circular sector with a small central angle equal to x/n radian. The triangles (0, (1+i·x/n)^k, (1+i·x/n)^k+1) are mutually similar for all values of k. So for big values of n the limiting point of (1+ix/n)ⁿ is the point on the unit circle whose angle from the positive real axis is x radians. The polar coordinates of this point are (r,?) = (1,x), and the cartesian coordinates are (cos(x), sin(x)). So e ^i·x = cos(x) + i·sin(x), and this is Euler's formula, connecting algebra to trigonometry by means of complex numbers.

The solutions to the equation e^z = 1 are the integer multiples of 2·?·i :

\{ z : e^z=1 \} = \{ k\cdot 2\cdot \pi\cdot i : k \in \mathbb{Z} \}.

More generally, if e^b = a, then every solution to e^z = a can be obtained by adding an integer multiple of 2·?·i to b:

\{ z : e^z=a \} = \{ b+k\cdot 2\cdot\pi\cdot i : k \in \mathbb{Z} \} .

Thus the complex exponential function is a periodic function with period 2·?·i.

More simply: e^i?=−1; e^x+iy = e^x(cos y+i sin y) .

Trigonometric functions

It follows from Euler's formula that the trigonometric functions cosine and sine are

\cos(z) = \frac{e^{i\cdot z} + e^{-i\cdot z}}{2} \qquad \sin(z) = \frac{e^{i\cdot z} - e^{-i\cdot z}}{2\cdot i}.\,

Historically, cosine and sine were defined geometrically before the invention of complex numbers. The above formula reduces the complicated formulas for trigonometric functions of a sum into the simple exponentiation formula

e^{i\cdot (x+y)}=e^{i\cdot x}\cdot e^{i\cdot y}.\,

Using exponentiation with complex exponents one need not study trigonometry.

Complex powers of e

The power e^x+i·y is computed e^x · e^i·y. The real factor e^x is the absolute value of e^x+i·y and the complex factor e^i·y identifies the direction of e^x+i·y.

Complex powers of positive real numbers

If a is a positive real number, and z is any complex number, the power a^z is defined as e^z·ln(a), where x = ln(a) is the unique real solution to the equation e^x = a. So the same method working for real exponents also works for complex exponents. For example:

2 ⁱ = e ^i·ln(2) = cos(ln(2))+i·sin(ln(2)) = 0.7692+i·0.63896

e ⁱ = 0.54030+i·0.84147

10 ⁱ = −0.66820+i·0.74398

(e ^2·π) ⁱ = 535.49 ⁱ = 1

Powers of complex numbers

Integer powers of complex numbers are defined by repeated multiplication or division as above. Complex powers of positive reals are defined via e^x as above. These are continuous functions. Trying to extend these functions to the general case of non-integer powers of complex numbers that are not positive reals leads to difficulties. Either we define discontinuous functions or multivalued functions. None of these options are entirely satisfactory.

The rational power of a complex number must be the solution to an algebraic equation. For example, w = z^1/2 must be a solution to the equation w² = z. But if w is a solution, then so is −w, because (−1)² = 1 . So the algebraic equation w² = z is not sufficient for defining z^1/2. Choosing one of the two solutions as the principal value of z^1/2 leaves us with a function that is not continuous, and the usual rules for manipulating powers lead us astray.

The logarithm of a complex numbers

One solution, z = log a, to the equation e^z = a, is called the principal value of the complex logarithm. It is the unique solution whose imaginary part lies in the interval (−?, ?]. For example, log 1 = 0, log(−1) = ?i, log i = ?i/2, and log(−i) = −?i/2. The principal value of the logarithm is known as a branch of the logarithm; other branches can be specified by choosing a different range for the imaginary part of the logarithm. The boundary between branches is known as a branch cut. The principal value has a branch cut extending from the origin along the negative real axis, and is discontinuous at each point of the branch cut.

Complex power of a complex number

The general complex power a^b of a nonzero complex number a is defined as

a^b = e^{\ln(a^b)} = e^{b\cdot \ln a}\,

Using the identity from Euler's formula,

e^{b\cdot \ln a} = \cos(b\cdot \ln a) + i\sin(b\cdot \ln a)

When the exponent is a rational number the power z = a^n/m is a solution to the equation z^m = aⁿ .

The computation of complex powers is facilitated by converting the base a to polar form, as described in detail below.

Complex roots of unity

A complex number a such that aⁿ = 1 for a positive integer n is an nth root of unity. Geometrically, the nth roots of unity lie on the unit circle of the complex plane at the vertices of a regular n-gon with one vertex on the real number 1.

If zⁿ = 1 but z^k ? 1 for all natural numbers k such that 0 < k < n, then z is called a primitive nth root of unity. The negative unit −1 is the only primitive square root of unity. The imaginary unit i is one of the two primitive 4-th roots of unity; the other one is −i.

The number e^{2?i (1/n)} is the primitive nth root of unity with the smallest positive complex argument. (It is sometimes called the principal nth root of unity, although this terminology is not universal and should not be confused with the principal value of ⁿ?1, which is 1.^[1])

The other nth roots of unity are given by

\left( e^{2\pi i (1/n)} \right) ^k = e^{2\pi i k/n}

for 2 ? k ? n.

Roots of arbitrary complex numbers

Although there are infinitely many possible values for a general complex logarithm, there are only a finite number of values for the power a^z in the important special case where z = 1/n and n is a positive integer. These are the nth roots of a; they are solutions of the equation xⁿ = a. As with real roots, a second root is also called a square root and a third root is also called a cube root.

It is conventional in mathematics to define a^1/n as the principal value of the root. If a is a positive real number, it is also conventional to select a positive real number as the principal value of the root a^1/n. For general complex numbers, the nth root with the smallest argument is often selected as the principal value of the nth root operation, as with principal values of roots of unity.

The set of nth roots of a complex number a is obtained by multiplying the principal value a^1/n by each of the nth roots of unity. For example, the fourth roots of 16 are 2, −2, 2i, and −2i, because the principal value of the fourth root of 16 is 2 and the fourth roots of unity are 1, −1, i, and −i.

Computing complex powers

It is often easier to compute complex powers by writing the number to be exponentiated in polar form. Every complex number z can be written in the polar form

z = re^{i\theta} = e^{\log(r) + i\theta} \,,

where r is a non-negative real number and ? is the (real) argument of z. The argument, like the complex logarithm, has many possible values for each z and so a branch cut is used to choose a specific value. The polar form has a simple geometric interpretation: if a complex number u + iv is thought of as representing a point (u, v) in the complex plane using Cartesian coordinates, then (r, ?) is the same point in polar coordinates. That is, r is the "radius" r² = u² + v² and ? is the "angle" ? = atan2(v, u). The branch cut corresponds to the notion that a polar angle ? is ambiguous, since any multiple of 2? could be added to ? without changing the location of the point. The principal value (the most common branch cut), as mentioned above, corresponds to ? chosen in the interval (−?, ?].

In order to compute the complex power a^b, write a in polar form:

a = r e^{i\theta} \,.

Then

\log a = \log r + i \theta \,,

and thus

a^b = e^{b \log a} = e^{b(\log r + i\theta)}. \,

If b is decomposed as c + di, then the formula for a^b can be written more explicitly as

\left( r^c e^{-d\theta} \right) e^{i (d \log r + c\theta)} = \left( r^c e^{-d\theta} \right) \left[ \cos(d \log r + c\theta) + i \sin(d \log r + c\theta) \right].

This final formula allows complex powers to be computed easily from decompositions of the base into polar form and the exponent into Cartesian form. It is shown here both in polar form and in Cartesian form (via Euler's identity).

The following examples use the principal value, the branch cut which causes ? to be in the interval (−?, ?]. To compute iⁱ, write i in polar and Cartesian forms:

i = 1 \cdot e^{i \pi/2},\,

i = 0 + 1i.\,

Then the formula above, with r = 1, ? = ?/2, c = 0, and d = 1, yields:

\ i^i = \left( 1^0 e^{-\pi/2} \right) e^{i(1\cdot \log 1 + 0 \cdot \pi/2)} = e^{-\pi/2} \approx 0.2079.

Similarly, to find (−2)^{3 + 4i}, compute the polar form of −2,

-2 = 2e^{i \pi} \, ,

and use the formula above to compute

(-2)^{3+4i} = \left( 2^3 e^{-4\pi} \right) e^{i(4\log(2) + 3\pi)} \approx (2.602 - 1.006 i) \cdot 10^{-5}.

The value of a complex power depends on the branch used. For example, if the polar form i = 1e^i(5?/2) is used to compute i ⁱ, the power is found to be e^−5?/2; the principal value of i ⁱ, computed above, is e^−?/2.

Failure of power and logarithm identities

Identities for powers and logarithms that hold for positive real numbers may fail when the positive real numbers are replaced by arbitrary complex numbers. There is no method to define complex powers or the complex logarithm as complex-valued functions while preserving the identities these operations possess in the positive real numbers.

An example involving logarithms concerns the rule log(a^b) = b·log a, which holds whenever a is a positive real number and b is a real number. The following calculation shows that this identity does not hold in general for the principal value of the complex logarithm when a is not a positive real number:

i\pi = \log(-1) = \log((-i)^2) \neq 2\log(-i) = 2(-i\pi/2) = -i\pi.

Regardless of which branch of the logarithm is used, a similar failure of the identity will always exist.

An example involving power rules concerns the identities

(ab)^c = a^cb^c, \qquad \left ( \frac{a}{b}\right)^c = \frac{a^c}{b^c}.

These identities are valid when a and b are positive real numbers and c is a real number. But a calculation using principal values shows that

1 = (-1\cdot -1)^{1/2} \not = (-1)^{1/2}(-1)^{1/2} = -1,

and

i = (-1)^{1/2} = \left (\frac{1}{-1}\right )^{1/2} \not = \frac{1^{1/2}}{(-1)^{1/2}} = \frac{1}{i} = -i.

These examples illustrate that complex powers and logarithms do not behave the same way as their real counterparts, and so caution is required when working with the complex versions of these operations.

Zero to the zero power

Plot of z = abs(x^y) with different curves (red) showing how 0⁰ can evaluate to different values. The green curves all have a limit of 1.

In many settings, especially in foundations and combinatorics, 0⁰ is defined to be 1. This definition arises in foundational treatments of the natural numbers as finite cardinals, and is useful for shortening combinatorial identities and removing special cases from theorems, as illustrated below. In many other settings, 0⁰ is left undefined. In calculus, 0⁰ is an indeterminate form, which must be analyzed rather than evaluated. In general, mathematical analysis treats 0⁰ as undefined^[3] in order that the exponential function be continuous.

Justifications for defining 0⁰ = 1 include:

• When 0⁰ is regarded as an empty product of zeros, its value is 1.
• The combinatorial interpretation of 0⁰ is the number of empty tuples of elements from the empty set. There is exactly one empty tuple.
• Equivalently, the set-theoretic interpretation of 0⁰ is the number of functions from the empty set to the empty set. There is exactly one such function, the empty function.
• The limit of x^x as x ? 0 through positive numbers is 1.
• It greatly simplifies the theory of polynomials and power series that a constant term can be written ax⁰ for an arbitrary x. For example:
  • The formula for the coefficients in a product of polynomials would lose much of its simplicity if constant terms had to be treated specially.
  • A power series such as \textstyle e^{x} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!} is not valid for x = 0 unless 0⁰, which appears in the numerator of the first term of the series, is 1. Otherwise one would need to use the longer identity \textstyle e^{x} = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!} .
  • The binomial theorem \textstyle(1+x)^n = \sum_{k = 0}^n \binom{n}{k} x^k is not valid for x = 0, unless 0⁰ = 1.^[4] By defining 0⁰ to be 1, a special case of the theorem can be eliminated.
• In differential calculus, the power rule \frac{d}{dx} x^n = nx^{n-1} is not valid for n=1 at x=0 unless 0⁰ = 1. Defining it this way eliminates the need for a special case for the power rule.

In some contexts where the exponent varies continuously, it may be best to treat 0⁰ as an ill-defined quantity. Justifications for treating it as undefined include:

• The value 0⁰ often arises as the formal limit of exponentiated functions, f(x)^g(x), when f(x) and g(x) approach 0 as x approaches a (a constant or infinity). There, 0⁰ suggests [lim f(x)]^{lim g(x)}, which is a well defined quantity and is the correct value of lim f(x)^g(x) when f and g approach nonzero constants, but is not well defined when f and g approach 0. The same reasoning applies to certain powers involving infinity, \infty^0 and 1^\infty. A more abstract way of saying this is the following: The real function x^y of the two nonnegative real variables x and y is not continuous at the point (x, y) = (0, 0), and so 0⁰ is not determined by continuity.^[5] That is, the function x^y has no continuous extension from the open first quadrant to include the point (0,0).^[6] The rule in calculus, that \lim_{x \to a} f(x)^{g(x)} = (\lim_{x \to a} f(x))^{\lim_{x \to a} g(x)} whenever both sides of the equation are defined, would fail if 0⁰ were defined.
• The function z^z, viewed as a function of a complex number variable z and defined as e^z log z is undefined at z = 0 because log z is undefined at z = 0. Moreover, because z^z has a logarithmic branch point at z = 0, it is not common to extend the domain of z^z to the origin in this context.^[7]

Treatment in programming languages and calculators

The computer programming languages that evaluate 0⁰ to be 1^[8] include bc, Haskell, J, Java, MATLAB, ML, Perl, Python, R, Ruby, Scheme, and SQL. In the .NET Framework, the method System.Math.Pow treats 0⁰ to be 1. Microsoft Excel issues an error when it evaluates 0⁰.

Microsoft Windows' Calculator and Google search when used for its calculator function^[9] evaluate 0⁰ to 1.

Maple simplifies a⁰ to 1 and 0^a to 0, even if no constraints are placed on a, and evaluates 0⁰ to 1.

Mathematica simplifies a⁰ to 1, even if no constraints are placed on a. It does not simplify 0^a, and it takes 0⁰ to be an indeterminate form.

Powers with infinity

Exponential expressions involving infinity may be thought of as generalizations of more familiar kinds of exponentiation, but there are at least two sharply distinct kinds of generalization to the infinite case. On the one hand, there is the combinatorial or set theoretic interpretation; see exponentiation of cardinal numbers.

On the other hand, one can find expressions such as ?⁰ and 1^? arising in analysis for the same reason as 0⁰, and they are undefined for the same reason. That is, it is true that (lim f(x))^{lim g(x)} = lim f(x)^g(x) when f and g approach nonzero finite constants, but not when they approach 0 or ?; then, the limit of the power can be anything, not predictable from the limits of f and g.

However, if you have a number x^?, where |x|<1, then x^? converges to zero.

It does make sense to say that ?^? = ? if this is simply interpreted as an abbreviation for the theorem that if f and g both approach infinity as x approaches a, then lim f(x)^g(x) is also infinite. (Likewise, 7^? = ?, (1.3)^? = ?, etc.)

Efficiently computing a power

The simplest method of computing aⁿ requires n−1 multiplication operations, but it can be computed more efficiently as illustrated by the following example. To compute 2¹⁰⁰, note that 100 = 96 + 4 and 96 = 3*32. Compute the following in order:

2² = 4

(2²)² = 2⁴ = 16

(2⁴)² = 2⁸ = 256

(2⁸)² = 2¹⁶ = 65,536

(2¹⁶)² = 2³² = 4,294,967,296

2³² 2³² 2³²2⁴ = 2¹⁰⁰

This series of steps only requires 8 multiplication operations instead of 99.

In general, the number of multiplication operations required to compute aⁿ can be reduced to Θ(log n) by using exponentiation by squaring or (more generally) addition-chain exponentiation. Finding the minimal sequence of multiplications (the minimal-length addition chain for the exponent) for aⁿ is a difficult problem for which no efficient algorithms are currently known, but many reasonably efficient heuristic algorithms are available.

Exponential notation for function names

Placing an integer superscript after the name or symbol of a function, as if the function were being raised to a power, commonly refers to repeated function composition rather than repeated multiplication. Thus f³(x) may mean f(f(f(x))); in particular, f ^-1(x) usually denotes the inverse function of f.

However, for historical reasons, a special syntax applies to the trigonometric functions: a positive exponent applied to the function's abbreviation means that the result is raised to that power, while an exponent of −1 denotes the inverse function. That is, sin²x is just a shorthand way to write (sin x)² without using parentheses, whereas sin⁻¹x refers to the inverse function of the sine, also called arcsin x. There is no need for a shorthand for the reciprocals of trigonometric functions since each has its own name and abbreviation, for example 1 / sin(x) = (sin x)⁻¹ is csc x. A similar convention applies to logarithms, where log²(x) = (log (x))² and there is no common abbreviation for log(log(x)).

Generalizations of exponentiation

Exponentiation in abstract algebra

Exponentiation for integer exponents can be defined for quite general structures in abstract algebra.

Let X be a set with a power-associative binary operation, which we will write multiplicatively. In this very general situation, we can define xⁿ for any element x of X and any nonzero natural number n, by simply multiplying x by itself n times; by definition, power associativity means that it doesn't matter in which order we perform the multiplications.

Now additionally suppose that the operation has an identity element 1. Then we can define x⁰ to be equal to 1 for any x. Now xⁿ is defined for any natural number n, including 0.

Finally, suppose that the operation has inverses, and that the multiplication is associative (so that the magma is a group). Then we can define x⁻ⁿ to be the inverse of xⁿ when n is a natural number. Now xⁿ is defined for any integer n and any x in the group.

Exponentiation in this purely algebraic sense satisfies the following laws (whenever both sides are defined):

• \ x^{m+n}=x^mx^n
• \ x^{m-n}=x^m/x^n
• \ x^{-n}=1/x^n
• \ x^0=1
• \ x^1=x
• \ x^{-1}=1/x
• \ (x^m)^n=x^{mn}

Here, we use a division slash ("/") to indicate multiplying by an inverse, in order to reserve the symbol x⁻¹ for raising x to the power −1, rather than the inverse of x. However, as one of the laws above states, x⁻¹ is always equal to the inverse of x, so the notation doesn't matter in the end.

If in addition the multiplication operation is commutative (so that the set X is an abelian group), then we have some additional laws:

• (xy)ⁿ = xⁿyⁿ
• (x/y)ⁿ = xⁿ/yⁿ

If we take this whole theory of exponentiation in an algebraic context but write the binary operation additively, then "exponentiation is repeated multiplication" can be reinterpreted as "multiplication is repeated addition". Thus, each of the laws of exponentiation above has an analogue among laws of multiplication.

When one has several operations around, any of which might be repeated using exponentiation, it is common to indicate which operation is being repeated by placing its symbol in the superscript. Thus, x^*n is x * ··· * x, while x^#n is x # ··· # x, whatever the operations * and # might be.

Superscript notation is also used, especially in group theory, to indicate conjugation. That is, g^h = h⁻¹gh, where g and h are elements of some group. Although conjugation obeys some of the same laws as exponentiation, it is not an example of repeated multiplication in any sense. A quandle is an algebraic structure in which these laws of conjugation play a central role.

Exponentiation over sets

If n is a natural number and A is an arbitrary set, the expression Aⁿ is often used to denote the set of ordered n-tuples of elements of A. This is equivalent to letting Aⁿ denote the set of functions from the set {0, 1, 2, ..., n−1} to the set A; the n-tuple (a₀, a₁, a₂, ..., a_n−1) represents the function that sends i to a_i.

For an infinite cardinal number ? and a set A, the notation A^? is also used to denote the set of all functions from a set of size ? to A. This is sometimes written ^?A to distinguish it from cardinal exponentiation, defined below.

This generalized exponential can also be defined for operations on sets or for sets with extra structure. For example, in linear algebra, it makes sense to index direct sums of vector spaces over arbitrary index sets. That is, we can speak of

\bigoplus_{i \in \mathbb{N}} V_{i},

where each V_i is a vector space. Then if V_i = V for each i, the resulting direct sum can be written in exponential notation as V^(+)N, or simply V^N with the understanding that the direct sum is the default. We can again replace the set N with a cardinal number n to get Vⁿ, although without choosing a specific standard set with cardinality n, this is defined only up to isomorphism. Taking V to be the field R of real numbers (thought of as a vector space over itself) and n to be some natural number, we get the vector space that is most commonly studied in linear algebra, the Euclidean space Rⁿ.

If the base of the exponentiation operation is a set, the exponentiation operation is the Cartesian product unless otherwise stated. Since multiple Cartesian products produce an n-tuple, which can be represented by a function on a set of appropriate cardinality, S^N becomes simply the set of all functions from N to S in this case:

S^N \equiv \{ f: N \to S \}.\,

This fits in with the exponentiation of cardinal numbers, in the sense that |S^N| = |S|^|N|, where |X| is the cardinality of X. When N=2={0,1}, we have |2^X| = 2^|X|, where 2^X, usually denoted by PX, is the power set of X; each subset Y of X corresponds uniquely to a function on X taking the value 1 for x ? Y and 0 for x ? Y.

Exponentiation in category theory

In a Cartesian closed category, the exponential operation can be used to raise an arbitrary object to the power of another object. This generalizes the Cartesian product in the category of sets.

Exponentiation of cardinal and ordinal numbers

In set theory, there are exponential operations for cardinal and ordinal numbers.

If ? and ? are cardinal numbers, the expression ?^? represents the cardinality of the set of functions from any set of cardinality ? to any set of cardinality ?. If ? and ? are finite then this agrees with the ordinary exponential operation. For example, the set of 3-tuples of elements from a 2-element set has cardinality 8.

Exponentiation of cardinal numbers is distinct from exponentiation of ordinal numbers, which is defined by a limit process. In the ordinal numbers, exponentiation is defined by transfinite induction. For ordinals ? and ?, the exponential ?^? is the supremum of the ordinal product ?^?? over all ? < ?.

Repeated exponentiation

Just as exponentiation of natural numbers is motivated by repeated multiplication, it is possible to define an operation based on repeated exponentiation; this operation is sometimes called tetration. Iterating tetration leads to another operation, and so on. This sequence of operations is captured by the Ackermann function and Knuth's up-arrow notation.

Exponentiation in programming languages

The superscript notation x^y is convenient in handwriting but inconvenient for typewriters and computer terminals that align the baselines of all characters on each line. Many programming languages have alternate ways of expressing exponentiation that do not use superscripts:

• x ? y: Algol, Commodore BASIC
• x ^ y: BASIC, J, Matlab, R, Microsoft Excel, TeX (and its derivatives), Haskell (for integer exponents), and most computer algebra systems
• x ** y: Ada, Bash, Fortran, FoxPro, Perl, Python, Ruby, SAS, ABAP, Haskell (for floating-point exponents), Turing
• x * y: APL
• Power(x, y): Microsoft Excel, Delphi/Pascal (declared in "Math"-unit)
• pow(x, y): C, C++, PHP
• Math.pow(x, y): Java, JavaScript, Modula-3
• Math.Pow(x, y): C#
• (expt x y): Common Lisp, Scheme

In Bash, C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python and Ruby, the symbol ^ represents bitwise XOR. In Pascal, it represents indirection.

History of the notation

The term power was used by Euclid for the square of a line. Nicolas Chuquet used a form of exponential notation in the 15th century, which was later used by Henricus Grammateus and Michael Stifel. Samuel Jeake introduced the term indices in 1696.^[10] In the 16th century Robert Recorde used the terms square, cube, zenzizenzic (fourth power), surfolide (fifth), zenzicube (sixth), second surfolide (seventh) and Zenzizenzizenzic (eighth). Biquadrate has been used to refer to the fourth power as well.

Another historical synonym, involution,^[11] is now rare and should not be confused with its more common meaning.

References

See also

• Exponential growth and Exponential decay
• List of exponential topics
• Logarithm
• Tetration
• Modular exponentiation
• Nth root
• Unicode subscripts and superscripts

External links

• sci.math FAQ: What is 0⁰?
• Laws of Exponents with derivation and examples
• 1058 Powers of Two
• 10,000 powers of two (14.5 MB)

af:Magsverheffing ar:?? ca:Potència aritmètica cs:Umoc?ování da:Potens (matematik) de:Potenz (Mathematik) et:Astendamine es:Potenciación eo:Potenco (matematiko) fa:???? (?????) fr:Exposant (mathématiques) ko:???? id:Eksponen is:Veldi (stærðfræði) it:Potenza (matematica) he:???? (???????) la:Potentia (mathematica) hu:Hatvány nl:Machtsverheffen ja:?? no:Potens (matematikk) pl:Pot?ga pt:Exponenciação qu:Yupa huqariy ru:?????????? ? ??????? simple:Exponentiation sk:Mocnina sl:Potenciranje fi:Potenssi sv:Potens (matematik) tl:Eksponente th:?????????? vi:L?y th?a uk:?????????? ?? ??????? yi:?????? (?????????) zh:?